Tuesday, December 20, 2005

The difference slot

Here are a few of the words that have been forming in my head during the last couple of days. I'm glad that for once, the package arrived just a few days after the actual event.

There is no doubt that lot of people seem to have a hard time accepting that someone they know has a disability. This is easily proven by the endless amount of hasty, ignorant, misinformed, uncaring and downright malicious things both said and done to people with disabilites every day. Most of the people I spend my time with nowadays for the most part aren't like that. However, many of them, even though they seem superficially informed about basic disability issues, seem to belive in the difference slot.

The basic idea is that each and every person has their difference, and that it should be respected. Note the singular form, however. When they learn of my autism, which is usually the first major difference to come up in conversation, they seem to think "oh, so that's her difference". They then proceed to fill in my difference slot in their mental table, and everything is as it should be.

Or, so they think.

Then, a little while later, I happen to mention some other thing that makes me very different from most other people, and their belief system collides head-on with reality. Usually, it's another one of my disabilities that triggers it. This is when they almost invariably go "..." for a while, only to finish with "you have that too?" In other words, "your difference slot is already filled, and you can't have another one".

What happens afterwards depends on how open-minded the person is. The more flexible ones realise that their system doesn't apply to everyone, and adapt accordingly. These people tend to become (or remain) my friends. Then there's the ones who respond with denial, either trying to question or downplay this newly discovered difference, or in more annoying cases (since they're less honest) just get very quiet and uncomfortable whenever I mention any difference (especially if it's a disability) from then on.

I won't bore you with a list of my ailments, but I do have enough of them that some of them are bound to come up in the course of a normal conversation, simply because so many of them affect my daliy life in a multitude of ways. In fact, the only way I could avoid mentioning any of them would be to either lie about my life, or basically not talk about it at all. I don't care much for either of those options, as I'm not ashamed of the way I am.

I do, however, sometimes go a bit too far in my attempts to make people I care about comfortable around me, and since one of them is of the annoying-silence-upon-hints-of-disability type, I've been going out of my way to keep that subject out of our conversations, mostly because I had no idea why people acted that way. It was just one more peculiarity in a world of very strange and illogical people (i.e. what they call "normal people").

Then I read some eye-opening words and learned some reasons behind such behaviour, i.e. people projecting their fears and negative beliefs of disability onto my often quite enjoyable life. With some insight into the patterns behind it, I could begin to structure and understand my feelings on the subject, and also put them into these words. It also helped me realise a very important difference, one that I've been trying to understand for a very long time; that between speaking of a thing and whining about it.

According to everyone I know, except this one person, I very rarely whine about my difficulties, and yet I've been terrified that he might think I do, since I've been taught that his behaviour means "your experiences are not valid and I won't help you". This is another one of those dysfunctional lessons I learned as a child, as any complaint or request for accomodation that people didn't belive I needed, didn't understand, or simply didn't want to bother about, was dismissed as whining.

But mentioning a problem isn't the same as whining about it. This may sound obvious, but I only fully realised it this last Friday. I also realised some of the implications of this, one of which being that it's not my responsibility to censor myself if people are so afraid of hearing anything negative that they cannot tolerate balanced discussions of everyday life.

I have a hard time understanding this unwillningness to discuss anything negative, or even not explicitly positive, but I see it quite often. Most of the people I've seen displaying this attitude have done so in defense of beliefs they either know or have begun to suspect are false, so my theory is that it's a version of the "stop confusing me with the truth"-argument. I'm open to alternative explanations, of course.

If you're the person I'm writing about (hi there), then this entry means that won't avoid talking about my life from now on, and if you're unable to deal with hearing about a disabled person's life, then that's really not my problem. However, if you're one of the other close to six and a half billion human beings on this planet, then this is not about my personal life; it's about certain patterns of ablist attitudes and assumptions.

If you interpret it as anything else than that, then you've missed my point.

Update: Linguistic tinkerings.
Update: Ballastexistenz moved again.

6 comments:

Book Girl said...

Oh, I've run up against so much of this, too. And people get really confused when I say that there are other things I have that are harder to cope with than the CP - like the depression, that they can't see. And they really struggle with the fact that I regard the disabilities as the more `normal' things about me.

People in my past have often used the `whining' accusation to silence me. It's never as bad for ab's to `whine' - and oh, how they do - than it is for us to talk about our realities. My brain is too scrambled to tease out the reasons for and implications of this, but you've done a brilliant job.

Yet another post that I'm so glad that you wrote - and that I feel privileged to read.

Thank you.

Book Girl said...

Forgot to respond to this paragraph:

"I have a hard time understanding this unwillningness to discuss anything negative, or even not explicitly positive, but I see it quite often. Most of the people I've seen displaying this attitude have done so in defense of beliefs they either know or have begun to suspect are false, so my theory is that it's a version of the "stop confusing me with the truth"-argument. I'm open to alternative explanations, of course."

My psychologist calls this `whistling in the dark'. It's denial, cowardice, head in the sand behaviour, because if they acknowledge harsh realities they have to feel the difficult emotions that go along with that, and be aware of the suffering of themselves and others, and perhaps do something about it.

TS Eliot said it well `Humankind cannot bear too much reality."

You and I, and others like us - we are too much reality for them.

ballastexistenz said...

...and now I was going to write a comment, but decided it was getting post-length too, so I wrote it here.

ballastexistenz said...

A reply to book girl - Yes. The difference between talking about our lives and going "Poor me" seems to be lost on a lot of people. I think it's built in to a lot of people's ideas, that if we talk about certain things, since they would pity us for experiencing them, then we must be pitying ourselves in talking about them. Or something strange like that.

Estee Klar-Wolfond said...

Thanks for this...I replied in Autism Diva's blog.

Estee

Fenners^Kerry said...

We were pointed to this article by some friends of ours just now, mostly because the premise of it is similar to this one: http://exunoplures.info/blog/?p=57. What you say is quite true -- it does seem that people seem to like to allot people one 'difference slot' per person.

--Kerry